Skip to main content

What If We Addressed Problems Holistically


What If…

We treated problems holistically instead of individually?

              One of the things I realized early on in my adult education was the relationship between seemingly disparate ideas. My bachelor’s degree focused on the relationship between biological equilibrium, environmental factors, and the mental reaction of individuals. From the beginning, I knew that it was folly to think that any of these categories could be studied in a vacuum. It did not take long for me to realize that it was not only in my own specialty that this was true, but in many other aspects of life. Yet, the compartmentalized view of the world is how the general populace perceives its environment, and social problems in particular.

              As an educator, I found myself unable to teach only the subject with which I was tasked. I found the need for students to be able to express themselves in written and verbal form necessary to master the scientific concepts I was mandated to teach. I also knew that a comfort level with basic algebra was required in order to see the patterns and relationships between scientific phenomena. I am fortunate enough to be able to teach and develop these related skills in my classroom, but have come across far too many colleagues who are either unable or unwilling to do the same. The difficulty of this task increases with age, as the ability gap increases and the assumptions of understanding are greater.

              This trend is present in all other aspects of human life, whether it be poverty or climate change, income inequality or crime rates, xenophobia or individuality. Even though all of these factors are related and impact each other, whether for good or ill, lawmakers and the wealthy choose to deal with them as though they can be fixed independent of one another. While some relationships are more direct and obvious, such as those in physical science, the more pernicious ones resemble the relationships in life sciences, which are multivariate and contain an almost infinite amount of possible outcomes. It is here that trends and statistics inform what the most effective solutions can be to these complex problems.

              All of these problems can be alleviated, if not solved, if we as social creatures acted in concert for the benefit of everyone. This can only be done well if we develop complex solutions implemented with surgical precision at the sources of the problems. Band-aids are no longer acceptable to treat bullet wounds that have become, in many aspects, infected by the secondary infection of problems only created by neglect of the original injury.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The What If Series Introduction

The What If… Series               What if we focused on how to truly solve problems, instead of putting band-aids on bullet wounds? What if we restarted discourse so that we focused on how to help each other, instead of complaining about how we are not as happy as we could be? What if we spent more time talking about the good we can do, instead of the evils done by others? These and other fundamental questions will drive my new What If… series of blog posts.               The inspiration for the series comes from my experience as a classroom teacher. I am a fan of discourse and questions in the classroom, and encourage them from my students. Often, I will hear a “What if” question from my students, usually presented as a source of distraction. My answer to this is often, “Your guess is as good as mine. Think about it and let me know what you come up...

Composite War

              A declared war seems more plausible now than in any point in my life, aside from the days after September 11, 2001. You may disagree with me, but you’re reading this, so you get my opinion. In my more negative musings on this fear, I wonder what could spark this war and what would characterize the two sides. After today’s research, mostly accidental, I have a bleak fiction to share with everyone, in the hopes that this doesn’t happen.               The Federalist Papers discuss many predictions about the fate of the nation. One of the fates they discuss is a civil war as the only way to reconcile dissent among the states. In order for a faction to form, a strong state will act as a primary aggressor who will pull neighbors into their fold by philosophical or economic means. In the Civil War, this character was played by South Carolina, an...