Skip to main content

Musing On The News - Abortion's Fringes

Lawyer argues fetus of jailed pregnant woman is being illegally detained. 

By The Guardian - February 23rd, 2023

    Okay, this is treasure trove of hot button issues, and in my desire to make everyone happy, this gave me pause because of the quagmire fetal rights is becoming. Basically, a woman in Florida is pregnant and being held without bail awaiting trial and alleges she is not getting adequate care and the fetus is being jailed unconstitutionally. So many issues to unpack in this one.

    First, there is the can of worms that is giving an unborn fetus the same rights as an autonomous, living person. I'm not sure how I feel about this movement and find it hard to discuss because it is such an emotional issue for so many people, including myself. I think the first thing we can do is stop doing the Either-Or argument with fetus and mother. Mom and fetus have equal weight until it has a bearing on the economy and governmental health, then the mother gets precedent because she is an avowed citizen of the United States, while the fetus has no choice, nor can it make one. This is one suggestion, but I don't expect anyone to take it seriously. I can already see some of the flaws...which, by the way, any plan will have, so people need to stop thinking their policies are perfect or better than others when they all tend to miss a large part of the whole picture.

    Moving away from abortion laws, there is the issue of bail and being pregnant in prison. I think that if a woman is pregnant and not convicted, she should not be in jail and bail should be waived. If you've ever been pregnant, and ever been to a jail, you know that this is cruel and unusual punishment all by itself. Thinking of the woman's right to a speedy trial, she's done half her pregnancy without the trial starting. This happens to people throughout the country and it is unconstitutional based on both the 6th and 8th amendments. Regardless of the court cases that have come through history to weaken these rights, they remained enshrined in our Constitution, and should be fought for. Months in jail is not the right a speedy trial, and bail disproportionately affects the poor, making debtors and homeless where there didn't have to be. The holding in prison doesn't just negatively affect moms-to-be, but a whole community of providers who cannot fend for themselves or their family while they are languishing in prison awaiting trial.

    I am going to do an economic side note on this one: People who know they have a trial and will not run need to be given the opportunity to work and coordinate with their community so their children and family members will be looked out for in their absence. These alleged criminals could work without fear and continue their lives while they await trial; a privilege enjoyed by the wealthy alone. People in jail funnel taxpayer money to the private prison corporations, instead of the individuals contributing tax dollars to the community and putting into the economy for several months. This means that on an individual and national level, bail is draining resources from the working people and funneling them to the corporations. Friendly reminder that corporations exist to provide dividends for their shareholders, not to take care of people. In fact, those two ends are often at cross-purposes. This leads me to the idea that industries that are tied to human survival and well-being (food, water, prison, healthcare) should not be run by amoral entities (which is what corporations are: they might be run by people, but they are not human and have no moral obligation to consider anything but the "almighty dollar"). In the case in the article, this is made clear by the lack of care and consideration afforded the pregnant woman and her unborn child.

    Another musing I got from the fetal rights portion of the article was the right to life is tied to the right to die: another controversial topic. If a fetus is not going to survive the birth, whether or not the mother is in danger, isn't it human to prevent the suffering that would be all the fetus would know in its short life. The fetus cannot advocate for itself; that's the mother's job. If the fetus will survive, but the mother won't, then not only did the baby murder the mother with the help of doctors, but that child is an orphan, which automatically dramatically reduces positive outcomes in its lifetime. We are condemning women to death and children to pathological childhoods; why is this what we're fighting for? If we were as humane to dying people as we are to dying animals, we would have right to die laws that would protect people and families from economic and social hardships that no one would wish on their fellow humans.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Musing on the News - Book Bans

                 Time published an article on 4/20 titled “New Report Finds That Book Bans Have Reached Their Highest Levels Yet.” As an avid reader I am immediately bothered by this, but I think it is worth explaining why.               First, over half the country is functionally illiterate, and even more don’t like to read, so who are we banning books for, anyway? It’s not like online ads that subliminally change your thinking. If you want to read a book, you have to physically get it, let someone else know what you’re reading (checking it out of a library or buying it in a store), and spend hours reading the material, depending on how fast you read. Reading is also self-selecting, as you can figure out by the book cover and back if you want to spend the time to decipher its contents. Reading social media and news is anonymous (except for the data points being collected on ...

The Viral Candidate - Kids

Kids               I don’t want to run for public office, I never have, but if I did, I would focus on our children and how to set them up for future success. As a member of the first generation in this country predicted to be worse off than their parents both physically and financially, this is particularly important for me . Kids are our future, and we need to do a better job taking care of them and enabling them to have the quality of life we wish for them (which I’m assuming is better than the one we have made for ourselves). I’m a public-school teacher of middle and high school students and have been for over a decade (since before the iPhone came out and teaching fully metamorphosed into an exercise in frustration). As a public servant and one who has a heart for the future success of our nation through the next generation, I find it important to address what we are going to do for our descendants (while figuring ...

On Hold

  The Viral Candidate – On Hold               I really don’t want to run for office. I’m an idea person, not an implementation person. I have a lot of ideas that I think would do a lot of good. I realized that all the political candidates have done something “noteworthy” in politics or life before trying to run the country. This feels elitist, but also ensures intelligent, capable people are the ones running. Or maybe those are the people who refuse to run because our political landscape has gotten so toxic. With that thought, I want to finish some of my ideas and do something larger than being a high school teacher before I try to imagine a national political campaign. Therefore, I am putting the Viral Candidate project on hold for a year.               I have been trying to find a way to build a platform and have done so with little guidance so far...