Skip to main content

The Anti-Federalist Papers - Part 1


The underlying foundation of The Study (my current project) are the principles that the founding fathers held dear with the addition of the advancements of modern society. Part of creating the world after The Study is staying true to the original ideals that formed this country.

              The purpose of the anti-federalists was very similar to mine: freedom from tyranny by any form of elite, preserve community identity and personal freedoms. One of the greatest fears of the anti-federalists was that the will of the people would be drowned out by the will of the wealthy. This is something that appears to be happening now, which makes a closer look at these ideals that a large percentage of founders ascribed to.

              The Federalist Papers are a collection of documents that is frequently found in high school social science curriculum, and contains ideas much closer to the Constitution the country holds in such high regard. The anti-federalist papers are mostly unknown to society, even those I’ve spoken with that enjoyed history in school and had great teachers. This side of the argument is less represented, and its key players are obscure in our modern minds relative to their ideological opponents. It is said that history is written by the victors. This fact alone would explain why the anti-federalists ideas are studied less frequently, even though they are responsible for such important documents as the Bill of Rights.

              The antifederalists and I also have a shared cherished belief: that good nature and strong wills are innate in all people. They wanted the laws to allow for the maximum amount that people can act as their best selves. This is something they thought would be prevented by a strong central government, as the creation of classes lead to behavior that marginalizes the other based on wealth.

              When I first read the introduction to the ideal of the opposing side of the constitutional debate, I thought that no one would listen to these ideas because they seem contradicted by the baser natures of people. When I realized that this faction was large and a strong voice in the conventions and the nation’s early years, I knew that reading their work is just as important as the more common Federalist Papers.
              The ideals of the anti-federalists could have been what shaped our country. I think it would have been more difficult, but worth it in the long run. I’m withholding my final opinion on the type of government I think would work until The Study is published, but I think a critical read of both sides of the debates that formed this country is key to understand what the founders of this country wanted for the people. It will take time to read and digest all of their works, but I will share with you their wisdom and influence on our nation’s ideals as I come to understand them better. I will do the same for the Federalist Papers, and any other source documents I enjoy through my research.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What If We Addressed Problems Holistically

What If… We treated problems holistically instead of individually?               One of the things I realized early on in my adult education was the relationship between seemingly disparate ideas. My bachelor’s degree focused on the relationship between biological equilibrium, environmental factors, and the mental reaction of individuals. From the beginning, I knew that it was folly to think that any of these categories could be studied in a vacuum. It did not take long for me to realize that it was not only in my own specialty that this was true, but in many other aspects of life. Yet, the compartmentalized view of the world is how the general populace perceives its environment, and social problems in particular.               As an educator, I found myself unable to teach only the subject with which I was tasked. I found the need for students t...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Viral Candidate - Housing

Am I actually running for president? Not now. I am reasonable enough to know that an idea borne of frustration at lacking a candidate that represents me and my family is not going to change the world. But an idea can change the world, and these generations are the ones most capable of doing so. I am going to dream of a world where no one is hungry, thirsty, or at the mercy of the elements. If I was running for president, I would need to explain my platform, get feedback, and adapt it to the needs of each community. The problem is most people focus on one or two issues and try to solve them independently. What I have learned as a science teacher and a student of the social sciences is that many issues are intertwined and need to be addressed as a whole, instead of in parts, if they are going to be any good for the average American.               For example, I want to tackle homelessness. That is a doozy and requires so...
Post a Comment
Read more

Musing on the News - Book Bans

                 Time published an article on 4/20 titled “New Report Finds That Book Bans Have Reached Their Highest Levels Yet.” As an avid reader I am immediately bothered by this, but I think it is worth explaining why.               First, over half the country is functionally illiterate, and even more don’t like to read, so who are we banning books for, anyway? It’s not like online ads that subliminally change your thinking. If you want to read a book, you have to physically get it, let someone else know what you’re reading (checking it out of a library or buying it in a store), and spend hours reading the material, depending on how fast you read. Reading is also self-selecting, as you can figure out by the book cover and back if you want to spend the time to decipher its contents. Reading social media and news is anonymous (except for the data points being collected on ...
Post a Comment
Read more